Analysis Report
- >90% — Very high certainty. Strong evidence.
- 75-90% — High confidence. Clear indicators detected.
- 50-75% — Moderate. Some signals present.
- <50% — Low confidence. Inconclusive or borderline.
Our AI analyzes 16 frames using temporal patterns, frequency analysis, and neural network detection.
- High — AI detected with >75% confidence. Treat with caution.
- Moderate — Some indicators present (50–75%). Verify if important.
- Low — Appears authentic with >80% confidence.
This video appears to be authentic with no significant indicators of AI manipulation detected. The analysis found natural patterns consistent with real footage.
What this means in practice
- No strong AI manipulation signals were detected
- Standard verification is still recommended for important claims
- Video compression or editing may affect detection accuracy
Detection Signals Reviewed
The following independent signals were evaluated. Percentages indicate the relative strength of AI-related anomalies detected.
Why this matters
Our neural network recognizes subtle patterns invisible to the human eye.
Why this matters
AI generators leave artifacts in the frequency domain of video signals.
Why this matters
Optical flow analysis reveals unnatural movement patterns in synthetic video.
Why this matters
Lip-sync errors are telltale signs of face-swapping deepfakes.
Why this matters
File metadata can reveal AI generation signatures or unusual encoding.
Why this matters
AI-generated audio has subtle artifacts in frequency distribution.
Help improve our AI detection
Sign in to submit feedback and earn reputation points
Sign in to contribute